Disney Removes ABC, ESPN, and Other Networks from DirecTV Amidst High-Stakes Carriage Dispute

New York — In a significant development within the entertainment industry, The Walt Disney Company has pulled its ABC stations, ESPN, and a slew of other cable networks from DirecTV’s lineup, following a failure to secure a new distribution agreement. This blackout, which took effect on Sunday, has left millions of sports enthusiasts without access to crucial broadcasts just as the college football season kicks off and the NFL season looms on the horizon.

The dispute stems from the expiration of an existing carriage agreement between Disney and DirecTV, resulting in a service disruption that impacts over 11 million satellite subscribers. This comes at a particularly critical moment, with Sunday night’s highly anticipated college football matchup between the USC Trojans and LSU Tigers, the ongoing US Open tennis tournament, and the impending start of the NFL season. The timing of the blackout has further exacerbated frustrations among consumers and industry observers alike.

Rob Thun, DirecTV’s Chief Content Officer, voiced the company’s grievances in a strongly worded statement, accusing Disney of shirking its responsibilities to consumers, distribution partners, and even the broader legal framework. “Disney is in the business of creating alternate realities, but this is the real world where we believe you earn your way and must answer for your own actions,” Thun stated. He went on to accuse Disney of prioritizing profit maximization and maintaining dominant control at the expense of consumer choice, making it increasingly difficult for viewers to access their preferred shows and sports at reasonable prices.

The blackout has not only affected ESPN and ABC affiliates, but has also led to the removal of other popular Disney-owned networks from DirecTV’s service, including FX, National Geographic, and Freeform. This wide-reaching disruption has amplified the stakes of the ongoing negotiation.

In response, Disney Entertainment’s leadership, including Dana Walden, Alan Bergman, and ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro, issued a statement expressing their disappointment with DirecTV’s decision to remove their content. They emphasized their willingness to offer DirecTV flexible terms similar to those extended to other distributors, but made it clear that they would not accept an agreement that undervalues their extensive portfolio of channels and programming. “We urge DirecTV to do what’s in the best interest of their customers and finalize a deal that would immediately restore our programming,” the statement read.

As negotiations continue, sources familiar with the matter revealed that Disney had proposed a sports-focused package to DirecTV. This package included ESPN networks, ABC sports broadcasts, and a selection of Disney’s linear channels, bundled with some of the company’s direct-to-consumer services. Disney has maintained that the rates they are seeking are consistent with those of other providers and reflect the value of their entertainment offerings. However, DirecTV contends that Disney’s demands include “unreasonable” financial terms and legal concessions, particularly regarding future claims of anti-competitive behavior.

The breakdown of these talks highlights a broader trend within the media industry, where cable and satellite providers are pushing for more streamlined and flexible channel bundles. These “skinny bundles” are seen as a potential solution to rising costs and the increasing consumer demand for more personalized viewing options. However, according to Thun, programmers like Disney continue to impose rigid bundling requirements, which include high minimum penetration rates – the percentage of a distributor’s subscribers required to carry a channel – thereby limiting the ability to offer more affordable packages.

This standoff also underscores the ongoing shift within the media landscape as major companies, including Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery (CNN’s parent company), and Paramount, increasingly prioritize their streaming services over traditional cable and satellite distribution. By moving premium content to direct-to-consumer platforms, these companies are seeking to capture a larger share of the growing streaming market, even as it means risking alienating traditional pay-TV subscribers.

Thun criticized Disney’s strategy in this regard, arguing that consumers are being forced to pay multiple times for the same content across various Disney platforms, all while seeing their favorite shows and sports teams disappear from traditional channels. “Disney’s only magic is forcing prices to go up while simultaneously making its content disappear,” Thun remarked.

This dispute is reminiscent of last year’s carriage negotiations between Disney and Charter Communications, which nearly led to a blackout of “Monday Night Football” on Charter’s Spectrum service. That standoff was resolved after Disney agreed to a deal that granted Charter subscribers access to Disney+ and ESPN+ services, highlighting the growing importance of streaming in these negotiations.

As legacy media companies continue to pivot towards streaming, they face the challenge of balancing the demands of traditional pay-TV distribution with the need to grow their digital platforms. This shift, driven in part by the rise of streaming giants like Netflix, has led to increasing friction between content providers and distributors.

Adding to the complexity of the situation, a recent legal development saw a federal judge temporarily block the launch of a new sports-focused streaming venture jointly proposed by Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Fox Corporation. The judge’s decision, which followed a lawsuit by smaller rival Fubo, alleged that the trio was attempting to create a monopolistic bundle that would stifle competition in the sports streaming market. As the dispute between Disney and DirecTV drags on, the outcome will likely have significant implications for both companies and the broader media landscape, especially as the battle for control of the lucrative sports broadcasting market intensifies.

Share This to: