Boeing Faces Potential Crisis as 32,000 Workers Threaten to Strike Amid Ongoing Turmoil

New York — Boeing, a company that has weathered a series of significant challenges over the past six years, is now facing the possibility of a new crisis: a strike by 32,000 workers that could begin later this month. This looming labor dispute could add to Boeing’s already extensive list of problems, further complicating its efforts to stabilize and regain its footing in the aerospace industry.

The current contract between Boeing and the International Association of Machinists (IAM) is set to expire at 11:59 pm PT on September 12. Should the two sides fail to reach a new agreement, workers who are responsible for building Boeing’s aircraft in Washington state could initiate the company’s first strike in 16 years. According to union leaders, the prospects for reaching a deal are uncertain at best.

“We’re significantly apart on all the key issues—wages, health care, retirement, and time off,” said Jon Holden, president of IAM District 751, in an interview with CNN. “While negotiations continue, the process has been arduous, and bridging these gaps remains a substantial challenge.”

This potential strike comes at a time when Boeing is already grappling with numerous high-profile setbacks. These include fatal crashes linked to design flaws in its best-selling jet, accusations of prioritizing profits over safety, declining aircraft sales, a guilty plea to criminal charges related to deceiving regulators, and massive financial losses that have driven the company into deep debt.

Both Boeing and the union express a desire to avoid a strike. However, the frustration among union members, stemming from previous contract concessions and the company’s ongoing struggles, could make a swift resolution difficult to achieve.

“We are committed to bargaining in good faith, focusing on the issues that matter most to our employees and their families,” Boeing stated. “We believe we can reach an agreement that balances the needs of our workforce with the realities of our business.”

Despite this optimistic tone, Holden emphasized that any agreement would need to address the concessions made in the two prior contracts since 2008. Both previous negotiations resulted in contract extensions rather than new agreements, during which the union felt compelled to accept significant concessions, including higher health insurance costs and the loss of traditional pension plans. At the time, Boeing had threatened to shift production of the 737 Max and 777X to non-union facilities, a move that was ultimately avoided after labor deals were secured.

Leadership Change Adds Complexity to Negotiations

Adding to the complexity of the negotiations is Boeing’s recent leadership change. Kelly Ortberg, who assumed the role of CEO on August 8, is entering the talks with a stated goal of “resetting the relationship” with the union. Ortberg has already met with Holden and other union leaders, expressing a desire to improve relations. However, Holden noted that there has been little change in Boeing’s approach at the bargaining table.

Ortberg’s predecessor, Dave Calhoun, had signaled to investors in July that Boeing was prepared to do what it takes to avoid a strike, including potentially meeting the union’s wage demands. “We understand that wage expectations are high,” Calhoun said. “We are committed to treating our employees well and will work diligently to prevent a work stoppage.”

Over the past decade, Boeing asserts that wages for IAM members have increased by 60% due to general wage increases, cost-of-living adjustments, and incentive pay. Nevertheless, union members remain discontented with the previous concessions and are pushing for improved time off and stronger job security guarantees to prevent future threats of outsourcing work to non-union facilities.

“We cannot afford to face another situation where our jobs are in jeopardy,” Holden said, highlighting the union’s determination to secure better terms for its members.

Economic and Industry Implications of a Strike

The implications of a strike at Boeing would be far-reaching, given the company’s significant role in the U.S. economy. Despite its struggles, Boeing remains a major economic force, employing nearly 150,000 people in the U.S. alone. The company estimates its total economic impact at $79 billion, supporting 1.6 million direct and indirect jobs across 50 states through its network of over 9,900 suppliers.

More critically, Boeing is one of only two major suppliers of commercial jets to the global airline industry. The industry is already grappling with delays in Boeing’s aircraft deliveries, which are essential to addressing ongoing safety and quality concerns.

Holden emphasized that the union’s demands are reasonable, especially in light of Boeing’s financial challenges, which include $33.3 billion in core operating losses over the past five years. These losses have forced Boeing into significant debt, putting the company at risk of having its debt downgraded to junk bond status. Nevertheless, Holden insists that the union holds considerable leverage in these negotiations.

“They haven’t claimed they can’t afford our proposals,” Holden said. “Our demands are reasonable, and Boeing’s current predicament is the result of decisions to prioritize dividends and share repurchases over research and development. These choices, along with the crashes, have led us to this point.”

One of the union’s key objectives in these negotiations is to secure a seat for a union representative on Boeing’s board of directors, which has come under intense scrutiny for its handling of the company’s numerous issues.

“The board deserves criticism,” Holden said. “We’re not looking to run the company, but we want to ensure our voices are heard regarding the decisions being made. We care deeply about Boeing—it’s the board members who don’t seem to. They’ve sacrificed the company’s integrity.”

As the September 12 deadline approaches, both Boeing and the union face mounting pressure to reach an agreement. The outcome of these negotiations will not only determine the immediate future of Boeing’s workforce but also have significant implications for the company’s role in the broader aerospace industry and the U.S. economy.

Share This to: